Contact Us | En español    
         Join today or login

Status

New Here?
Sign Up
Fast! Three Questions.

Already a member?
Login

Contests

80 Word Flash Fiction
Deadline: In 3 Days

Rhyming Poem
Deadline: In 5 Days

Loop Poetry Contest
Deadline: Apr 12th

Haiku
Deadline: Apr 15th

Dribble Flash Fiction
Deadline: Apr 20th


Writing Classes

0 classes available. Click here locate a class and to learn more.

Rank

Poet: None
Author: None
Novel: None
Reviewer:None
Votes: None






Reviews from
On the Limits of Free Speech


In trying times, should free speech be limited?

  4 total reviews 
Comment by
Insignificant Weed
Susan Weimer
Greensboro
 
Poet Rating
 
Author Rating For Short Works
 
Author Rating For Novels
 
Review Stars
 
 
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted
I want to compliment you on your determination to foster free speech. People are the given the freedom to say good or bad things, do good or bad things, and think good or bad things. So, we have a choice because freedom of speech is an innate God given privilege. We can abuse free speech by spewing words of hate or curse words. But, let us ask ourselves, which words are more effective? Hateful, demeaning and gutter language has an affect on both the person saying these words and the person hearing the diatribes. Sure, you can say whatever you want, but do you not have some kind of morality driving your actions toward other people? Free speech reigns; it will never go away. We have a choice in how we use our words. Speech cannot be legislated - it is up to us to use this gift in a positive way that will produce a harmonious society that can work together with different ideas, faith beliefs, political parties, age groups, and other social group that can be formed.
Thank you for sharing. We do need to be aware of the ideas and thinking of other groups that we don't associate with.
In this sentence, "Some of the teachers I worked with had a very strick idea of education." strick is misspelled - it should be strict
Not getting this - having difficulty understanding what the statement in parentheses is saying "that they had no self-control (any longer we live in a world of children, don't we?)"


 Comment Written 29-Oct-2018



reply by the author on 29-Oct-2018
    Thank you for the editing tips. I had corrected, actually, both of those on the site where I first posted this (recordingeditorialhistory.com), but I suppose I forgot to do so here. Thank you for your generous comments.
Comment by
Honey Bee Jean
 
 
Exceptional
This work has reached the exceptional level
I find this topic very interesting as a whole; free speech and it's effects. I like the part about outlawing words because the are genuinely offensive. You offer a lot of knowledge in the peice along with your personal opinion. Thank you for sharing!


 Comment Written 29-Oct-2018


Comment by
poesyapprentice
 
Review Stars
 
 
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted
Everyone has a right to their opinion, or do they? In this day and age we are expected to be PC to the utmost, and there's more whining over being offended than I can stomach. On the other hand, common decency and respect for others have been left far behind. Words should be used for good, to uplift, to right wrongs, to inspire growth, etc. I find it difficult to condone their use to intentionally be cruel and inflict pain on others, difficult to say one has a right to say horrid things, but censorship is a slippery slope, indeed. To whom should we give the right to decide what is allowed, our government? I think not! We all have minds, and voices, of our own, and we can only hope that more will be used wisely and with decency than not, and steady ready to fight the good fight when we feel we should. I found a couple of minor spag, which I'd have to reread to recall the specifics of, but an interesting, thought provoking read here. Well done.


 Comment Written 29-Oct-2018


Comment by
2014 Story Writer Of The Year
humpwhistle
Level 9 Pro
Premier Author
Premier Reader
 
Poet Rating
  Rank:  63 (+1)
Author Rating For Short Works
  Rank:  5
Author Rating For Novels
 
Script Rating
 
Review Stars
  Rank:  149
 

#5 Ranked Author
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted
True, free speech can be used as weapons of war. But was Thomas Paine a 'terrible person'? Was Fredrick Douglas a 'terrible person'? Was Abraham Lincoln a 'terrible person'? All used free speech to destroy 'something' they considered abhorrent. While I get your message, Lance, I think your opening lines are misleading. Free speech isn't the culprit. Reckless and unfounded speech is. Your opening lines fail to distinguish between them. Using our constitutional right of free speech to 'destroy' bigotry or oppression does not make us 'terrible people'.

I hope you'll reconsider your opening lines, Lance, because you can't hold water in a leaky sieve.

Peace, Lee


 Comment Written 29-Oct-2018



reply by the author on 29-Oct-2018
    You're absolutely right, but I am speaking to more than just people like you and I who agree with the good that can be done with words. The problem is that there is a blow back about everything and, speaking today, the circumstances are very different than with the American revolution, the abolitionist movement and the US Civil War (although we are approaching some similarities as well). No, what I am saying is that people are allowed to be racists; people are allowed to even say slavery should make a comeback. People can saying anything--anything, so long as they are willing to deal with the consequences. So yes. Yes. Words can be used as weapons. They can cause 'permanent damage,' which, frankly, I applaud.
  -1-   Next Page 


Market your book.
Advertising options.
Abel's Loss
of Eden, from Eve's Point of View


Share or Bookmark
  Contact Us | En español | Advertise With Us

© 2015 FanStory.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy